Sunday, December 27, 2020

The Rutles - Semi-Automatic (2017)

We stick with late 60's pop/psyche for the next Rutles album, with it's strange title (who on earth would name their album after a gun?!), and including the fab 'Nevertheless' - always a favourite.


Track listing

SIDE ONE
01 Promises
02 Time To Kill
03 My New School
04 Nevertheless
05 Now You're Asleep
06 Ging Gang Goolie
07 Get Your Mind Made Up

SIDE TWO
08 Gone Is The Sad Man
09 Make It Easy
10 Readymades
11 Poor Little Heartbreaker
12 Tree House
13 Knock On Wood
14 Joe Public

PERFORMERS
* The Rutles - 04, 14
* The Flame(s) - 07, 09, 13
* Neil Innes - 02, 03
* Timebox - 01, 08, 11, 12
* Dirk & Stig (Fataar/Idle) - 06
* The Bonzo Dog Doo Dah Band - 05, 10


on
Labels: , , , , ,

7 comments:

  1. Steve W.October 4, 2018 at 7:01 PM

    Assuming these are the Rutles Vinyls versions you're posting - please keep it up, if you have more! As I think I commented elsewhere, nearly all of them were pulled from YouTube, and are more or less lost forever.

    ReplyDelete
  2. pjOctober 5, 2018 at 12:39 PM

    Next week's 'The Shite Album' was going to be the last one, but I've been inspired to make up some more, and I now have all of them from this site http://rutlesriki.wikia.com/wiki/The_Rutles:_Complete_Discography so five more posts to come.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Steve W.October 17, 2018 at 7:36 AM

      If you need the new "Revolution 9" parody ("Evolution Number 10") from The Wheat Album, I can send that.

      Delete
    2. UnknownMay 14, 2020 at 6:24 PM

      Please send it, i can't find it anywhere, or upload it at Youtube

      Delete
    3. pjMay 15, 2020 at 1:17 AM

      Here you go. https://yadi.sk/d/W0Gz-eTrTTOODw

      Delete
  3. Derrick McMillonSeptember 9, 2019 at 9:02 AM

    Hello PJ. The second track "Time to Kill" could use an improvement in quality. Here's a YouTube video you can use. https://youtu.be/4AMY9SDkNAY?t=183 Otherwise, great album!

    ReplyDelete
  4. pjSeptember 10, 2019 at 8:40 AM

    Thanks for pointing that out, as the take that I used sounded fine to me, until I compared it with the other version, so link now updated.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

❄